WIDOW OF A BOILERMAKER APPEALS WORKERS'
COMP CASE
Publication: THE
CHARLESTON GAZETTE
Published: 05/27/1999
Page: P2A
Headline: WIDOW OF A BOILERMAKER APPEALS WORKERS' COMP CASE FIVE HURT IN
3-VEHICLE CRASH
Byline: PAUL J. NYDEN, STAFF WRITER
The
widow of a boilermaker who died from colon cancer hopes the Supreme Court
requires the Workers' Compensation Fund to consider
recent medical studies showing breathing asbestos can cause that disease.
Frances
Adams hopes to collect widow's benefits someday. For 34 years, her late husband
Claude was exposed to asbestos, when he worked as a rigger and boilermaker at
Union Carbide. Colon cancer claimed his life in November 1995, at 79.
Charleston
lawyer E. William Harvit asked the Supreme Court to look at the case in
October. His legal petition does not ask the court to
grant benefits immediately, but simply to require Workers' Compensation to
consider recent medical studies.
In
1988, the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board diagnosed Adams with pneumoconiosis and asbestosis. It granted
him a 15 percent impairment award.
But
when Adams died seven years later, the board ruled pneumoconiosis did not
directly cause his death.
Five
months after Claude's death, in March 1996, his widow Frances applied for
dependent's benefits. She included additional information
from her husband's autopsy at Putnam General Hospital.
Dr.
Dominic Gaziano, a Charleston pulmonary specialist, reviewed Adams' medical
records and concluded his colon cancer was due, in
part, to exposure to asbestos on the job.
Gaziano
stated there is "significant literature and opinion supporting the
association of asbestos and colon cancer." A letter he sent to
Harvit listed 11 recent medical studies reaching that conclusion.
Gaziano
also criticized a 1989 medical study cited by Union Carbide to disprove the
relation between breathing asbestos and colon cancer.
Gaziano wrote that the authors of that study had a "significant conflict possibly affecting their
objectivity."
In
January 1998, three Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board doctors - James H.
Walker, William C. Revercomb and Thomas M. Hayes - testified there was no
association between asbestosis and colon cancer. They recommended rejecting the claim from Frances Adams.
But
Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge Jim Gerchow sent the claim back to the agency for further
review. His March 1998 order did not grant Frances Adams any benefits, but
asked Workers' Compensation officials to review the studies Gaziano cited.
Union
Carbide lawyers objected to the order, stating Gerchow "exceeded his
authority" by asking the Workers' Compensation Fund to consider the
additional studies.
Last
September, the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board overruled Gerchow and
dismissed the claim. Harvit then appealed to the Supreme Court.
In
his dismissal order, Appeal Board Chairman R. Michael Shaw wrote that Adams
"did not object to this claim being processed as an occupational
pneumoconiosis claim At not time during the litigation did [Adams] ever request
that this matter be considered an as occupational disease claim."
Harvit
said Shaw issued the ruling because the Appeal Board "does not may not want to open the door to concluding
colon cancer cases can be linked to asbestos cases."
Shaw
said, "To the best of my knowledge, that argument was not made to us. We
called him [Harvit] to reset the hearing, but he never got back to us. He can't
really complain that we didn't treat him fairly."
Harvit
said, "I did file a timely response. I asked them to schedule a time for
me to respond. There was no hearing set. I never got an answer."
This
week, Shaw said his board has "zero authority to reconsider a case. Once
we enter an order, we cannot reconsider it."
Shaw
said his inability to reopen a case is "a defect that needs to be
considered next legislative session. We have a big volume of cases. We do the
best we can."
Harvit
said it is likely the Supreme Court will decide shortly on whether or not they
will hear the appeal for Frances Adams.
To contact staff writer Paul J.
Nyden, call 348-5164.